Up to now, we have been protected from radical Muslims because their fundamentalism keeps them from developing as persons, technologists, or entrepreneurs. And it is also helps that they have been pretty well occupied killing each other, ones of the wrong sect.
Well, that part of the equation is still the same. However, many Muslims just woke up with oil under their feet. It doesn't take a very advanced person to sell the oil and buy a nuclear bomb. The only real question I have is why they have not yet exploded a few, say, at our secure ports. That was sarcastic about the secure ports.
Of course, the U.S. should set the example of reducing the number of nuclear weapons. Let's say they reduce the number of nuclear weapons to just the amount required to destroy the world and let Russia do the same. Other countries could be issued fractional world destruction permits. For instance, perhaps Britian could keep enough nuclear weapons to destroy half the world. India maybe 25% of the world. Pakistan would want to be equal to India, etc. Of course, we have to figure out how many nuclear weapons it would take to wipe out the world. We could use some more "political science" science to determine the "number". Then we could use the U.N. to sell Wipe the World Out Shares. Kind of like permits to pollute so much. Lets say you start out with only enough nukes to wipe out 10% of the planet, but someone like Britian decides they don't really need 50% with their big buddy having 100% already. I mean, what good is a good jab after the knockout punch.
Well, of course, that is not going to happen. So back to our question. What is keeping Muslim fundamentalists from knocking out NY or LA. Our fundamentalists should edcuate them. They convinced us to go to war; surely they can keep a fellow fundamentalist how to accomplish a simple task of like buying and delivering a nuke.
My guess is that the Nuke has not been delivered because their are just so many targets to chose from. That is the only reason I can come up with. Think of all the good targets, SF, LA, NY, the superbowl, the subway, Niagra Falls, etc. The question is picking one that has the most symbolism. That is tough to come up with something better than the twin towers which really did represent well the U.S. way of life, for good or bad. Anyway, that is my best guess.
While figuring out the Muslims next move is difficult. It is not hard to figure out our next move. We will pick out some country not involved, not sitting on oil, and then drop a half dozen nuclear bombs on them. We will then double our nuclear arsenal and declare the world saver, the battle won. The Jehovah Bush crowd is pretty simple. Not hard to figure out their pattern of thought, although thought is really an inappropriate concept.
My bet then is this. They are waiting until we rebuild something where the twin towers were. We haven't done that yet, have we? I haven't been there for a couple of years. Anyway, that would perfect from their viewpoint. So perfection is probably what they will have.
No comments:
Post a Comment